AuditBot Reviews 

1
•
TrustScore 3.5 out of 5

3.7

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Company details

  1. Accounting Software Company
  2. also in
  3. Software Company

Written by the company

AuditBot builds AI tools for UK accounting and audit firms. It was founded in 2023 by accountants who spent years in practice and got tired of watching people lose weeks to manual work. The company runs three products under one roof. AuditBot automates audit fieldwork. It works as an Excel add-in and produces working papers in seconds, freeing audit teams to spend their time on judgement instead of admin. AccountsBot reviews draft accounts. It handles casting, cross-referencing, accounting logic and disclosure checklists for FRS 102 and IFRS, catching the errors that are easy to miss and slow to find by hand. TaxBot takes on personal tax returns. It collates the data and populates the return, stripping out the manual entry that eats January and letting accountants focus on higher-value work. We are ICAEW Technology Accredited and certified to ISO 27001, so firms know the tools meet a recognised standard and their data is handled properly. We work with firms of all sizes, from independent practices to the largest networks. Everything we build fits how firms already work, without complex integrations or months of onboarding, so teams see value quickly.


Contact info

3.7

Average

TrustScore 3.5 out of 5

1 review

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No recent history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited customers recently, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

3.7

All reviews

(1)

1 review in the last 12 months

Write a review

We perform checks on reviews

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Auditbot and Accountsbot review

A lot of time on an audit can be taken up by fairly repetitive work, and I’ve found AuditBot and AccountsBot useful for cutting down some of that.

The best features in AuditBot for me are the sampling and document matching, as these automate some of the more repetitive and time-consuming parts of audit testing. Being built into Excel also works really well as that is where I spend most of my time when working on an audit. One occasional issue is that the document matching can extract the correct data but sometimes presents it in the wrong format, so this still needs checking.

For AccountsBot, I find the accounts review and disclosure checklist the most useful. You can upload the current and prior year accounts, TB and supporting workpapers and work through the points raised online in a clear format. Both can then be exported to PDF and dropped straight onto the audit file, which is really useful for documenting the review.

10 September 2026
Unprompted review

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look