Userbenchmark Reviews 904

Worst reputation website to get information about performance.

"The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands." Website is mostly NVIDIA shill garbage but I went out of my way to leave a negative comment due to their hostility. TLDR; FU user benchmark, briggit nerd.

call people giving them bad reviews "virgins on trust pilot" says it all really

Well, nothing much to be said, you want unbiased and fair comparisons, go elsewhere, this site is basically garbage, but you can have a good time reading AMD's reviews, or their own review on why they score suck on Trustpilot.

Extremely biased against AMD to the point of parody. A shame as the site is very usable, but the data is unreliable!

Writing Misinformation about lots of products, are insulting people critizising their mistakes. Should start to change rather than stand behind their pitty words.

Bullshit site. Terrible at providing real actual useful data, even on devices they recommend most.

Even advertises an "explanation" why its trustpilot reviews are so terrible. Complete made up bs.

such a waste of time and pottential , they blatantly lie about every component and hugely biast with nvidia , do not trust this scam site, better watch some og tech channels on youtube for a good and honest reviews.

Absolute trash. I can understand benchmarks being outdated and providing outdated info, but Userbenchmark is blatantly feeding people lies and misinformation. Do not trust anything they say. Biased AF. Userbenchmark, if you're reading this, change your ways or GFY.

I don't know how much Intel is paying these guys, but they just outright lie about AMD performance, even going as far as to say that they lack "Real world performance" and are "designed to do well in benchmarks not real use". Insanity.

I would give this site a zero if I could. All the information they give is completely wrong and useless, especially their reviews of the 9070XT

Just the average fanatic. Actually clueless about hardware.

Biased website. Benchmarks should be neutral and not pick sides

For some reason this site is extremely biased, as if a certain company personally harmed the editor.

Furthermore, there is no standardization for the benchmarks, meaning abnormal results are accepted without question.

Based on these reasons, this site can mislead potential buyers trying to research a significant purchase.

The userbenchmark app is garbage. Because,

- server is always full and it doesn't launch the tests offline
- it has comments full of bias and non-professional approach
- the benchmarks do not use the hardware to their top performance, for example nbody does not use the gpu fully
- its not user-friendly
- for a very long time, all tests were forced even if only gpu benchmarks were wanted
- in aboutus page they say they are scientists. I think they are experimenting psychology related things more than hardware.

Biased website, fake benchmarks. This site is strictly an Intel mule. They bash AMD left and right when over and over again, they come out on top with value and performance. Don't waste your time comparing ANYTHING at userbenchmark. Make up your own numbers in a spreadsheet that always favor Intel and there you go, you've got your own userbenchmark.

This website is inaccurate and biased towards Intel/Nvidia products. You can check against any other review site and find actual real-world tests and benchmarks proving everything on this site is false. It's been like this for 8+ years now. It would be a useful site if they actually posted the truth/accurate data.

Do NOT trust any review from this website, they are FAKE ! Make a quick Google search if you want to understand why...

Despite the marketing revolving around benchmarks all given by users with fair unbiased perspectives, their obvious disliking of anything of AMD's products but also could even potentially misslead users with misleading reviews.

Having purchased mutliple amd GPU's and CPU's my experience between both Intel and AMD systems as well as Nvidia and Radeon systems have had varied results to say the least however most AMD products got their jobs done well at reasonable price points, however their is almost no credit to that and instead just blame towards creators for promoting AMD instead of their preferred brands.

I have personally fallen for their promotions when i was starting pc building. with their 3060 review transitioning from a 1070, while i expected a noticable 24 - 33% performance uplift as marketed during the gpu crisis, i instead got about a 10% performance uplift and only under intense loads, and of course their blatant mockery of AMD's prior generations disincentivized me from exploring their gpus. thus a hefty 600$ later during a silicon shortage i was left with less than desired performance. and of course years later even after the purchase of a 7900xtx they still have not decided to give AMD fair unbiased and neutral toned reviews and instead blame tech youtubers and creators saying that their misleading users despite writing biassed reviews on a site advertised to be verified by independent users.

While i wish they were less biased towards AMD and gave them fair strong points and weakpoints to compare with Nvidia in their reviews, im afraid i havent relied on their services since 2020