Twfmp Reviews 

2
TrustScore 3 out of 5

2.9

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more


Contact info

2.9

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

2 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

2.9

All reviews

(2)

0 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review

We perform checks on reviews

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Very poor service

Very poor service! find a professional mediation company.
Paul Kemp the owner is bias and should not be in practice as a mediator. His taking of notes is also inaccurate.
Do not use Twfmp! I wish I had listened to the bad reviews before I went there.

1 May 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

SHOCKING - Biased and unprofessional mediator.

SHOCKING – Biased and unprofessional mediator. I am extremely shocked and appalled by the three mediation sessions I witnessed between my partner and her ex-partner. The mediator, Paul Kemp, was extremely biased towards the other party and this was evident in his follow-up notes where he detailed the other party as having made all of the proposals and suggestions that my partner had actually put forward. The notes were riddled with inaccuracies and all 3 sets of Paul’s notes had been written to favour the other party; Paul was in no way in line with the Family Mediation Standards Boards codes of conduct regarding impartiality. Even after my partner arranged a meeting with Paul to discuss his biased and an issue relating to conflict of interest, Paul’s third set of notes were still factually incorrect and biased towards the other party. Due to this we cancelled the mediation process with The Worcester Family Mediation Practice (WFMP). To address our concerns further, I subsequently, raised my concerns to Paul in a letter attached to an email, to which he completely ignored, noting the WFMP did not have a complaints procedure at this time. This behaviour is reflective of his conduct within the mediation sessions where he was dismissive to points and concerns raised by my partner and me. My partner also submitted a formal complaint, and we have since received a response from the WFMP; essentially this was a standard response where they had no interest in investigating the issues further; thus, nothing will change.

I had attended these mediation sessions to support my partner as she was anxious about why mediation had been arranged by her ex-partner who is controlling and manipulative. Noting the sensitivities surrounding mediation it was emotionally difficult for her, to then be treated unfairly by Paul and receiving inaccurate notes caused her even more anxiety and disappointment. I’m a professional engineer and have been in the RAF for 23 years, I am so shocked at the lack of professionalism and how biased Paul was. Even when greeting Paul, he looked straight past me and had no real interest in engaging with my partner or me. This is not something we should have experienced, and I expected a high level of professionalism from someone who trained as a solicitor and has been a mediator for 30 years.
Paul’s impartiality and professionalism has previously been questioned; I recommend you read the Google review from Jenna-Leigh Cogbill, who had a similar experience, before proceeding with the WFMP.

I am unbale to comment on the professionalism of the other mediators at the Worcester Family Mediation Practice but as Paul is a Principal mediator for this practice I would proceed with caution.

19 May 2025
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look