Tri-Screen 3 Failed in 4 Months, Warranty Denied Without Inspection
I purchased the Xebec Tri-Screen 3 in December 2025 for $752. Within four months of light, normal desk use by one person, the right screen began displaying severe distortion. There is zero visible external damage, not a scratch, dent, or mark anywhere on the unit.
I filed a warranty claim with Xebec. After multiple exchanges, including an escalation to their Customer Support Manager, they denied my claim citing an "internal crack" caused by user impact or pressure. They made this determination entirely from a photo, without ever physically inspecting the unit. When I pushed back, they acknowledged in writing that this failure pattern is "consistent with similar cases they have seen in the past."
I also found another Trustpilot reviewer describing an identical failure and identical denial. That reviewer noted the product has no screen protection when folded, meaning normal flex is enough to cause this failure. That is a design flaw, not user damage.
I am a multi-product Xebec customer. I also own the Snap, which has held up without screen issues despite far rougher handling. The Tri-Screen 3 failed in four months of gentle desk use.
Xebec's "internal crack" denial is a blanket mechanism to avoid warranty responsibility for a known design flaw in a first-run product. They are unwilling to stand behind a $750 product that failed under normal use.








