Excire Reviews 

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Takes unorganised files and lets you find them effortlessly by using either metadata or machine learning analysis of the photo contents (or a mix of both)

I didn’t expect it to make such a difference, but trying Excire completely changed the way I manage my photos.

One thing that used to drive me crazy was the number of duplicate images piling up, same photo, slightly different edits, or just saved in multiple places. It made finding the right version exhausting and honestly slowed down my whole workflow.

Excire’s duplicate detection quietly solved all of that. It found everything, even images that weren’t exact copies but were similar enough to clutter my folders. No drama, no complicated steps. Just clean results.

Now my library actually feels manageable. I’m not second-guessing every file or wasting time opening three versions of the same shot. I didn’t realise how much energy I was spending on this until it wasn’t a problem anymore.

If you work with a lot of images, this is one of those things you don’t know you need until you try it.

This was the last time I spent money on a ai extension. thats Bullshit. You can't work with your own tagging system.

It is a shame the Lightroom - after all its years - does not provide what EXCIRE does.
That said, it should be avoided unless one has lots and lots of patience with its ambiguously vague terminology and lack of adequate support! This becomes particularly disasterous when one has become dependent on the substantial advantages its database/search/indexing capabilities Excire can ad to anybody with a medium/large Lightroom catalogue.
When the product was first presented all this could be seen as beginners bad luck, but after a number of years its simply bad for business.