Evening Standard Reviews 32

TrustScore 1.5 out of 5

1.6

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

See what reviewers are saying

Rated 2 out of 5 stars

Bit disappointed by potted history of Middle East today in the Standard.No mention of the 850,000 Jewish Arabs who were forced out from many surrounding Arab states in 1948 and mostly settled in Isr... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I didn't receive my packages? because one week gone already ! you are you promised me is coming By Three Days ? please let me know when is coming.? thank you

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

London Standard launch at 'dawn'with editors living in a Fleet Street bubble. Unable to frame the customer base of a 200 year old historical paper. The last thing they wanted to s... See more

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Great football and arts coverage, Antony Hilton is brilliant in the Finance section. Its a pity though about the Editorials, George gets a bit carried away with himself at times.

Company details

  1. News Service
  2. Entertainment Agency
  3. Media Company
  4. News Cooperation

Information provided by various external sources

Latest London news, business, sport, showbiz and entertainment from the London Evening Standard.


Contact info

1.6

Bad

TrustScore 1.5 out of 5

32 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Israeli Standard or London Evening Standard?

Scarcely any mention of the 20,000+ Palestinian children that were massacred by Israel’s reckless aerial bombardment of Gaza from October 2023, however the newspapers are quick to criticise peaceful protestors flagging up Israel’s military response by routinely conflating anti-Semitism with anti-Zionism.

Anti-Zionism is a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010, as per the legal precedent set in the case of Miller v University of Bristol: An employment tribunal in the UK has concluded that Anti-Zionist beliefs had met the criteria of being “worthy of respect in a democratic society, be not incompatible with human dignity and not conflict with the fundamental rights of others.”

Furthermore, the newspaper contains misinformation that concerns public health, as like many other newspapers they do not even report on the forgotten victims of mRNA harm. The journalists writing the articles are not biochemists, yet they make one-sided blanket statements on this subject.

The newspaper seems to have a conflict of interest in multiple areas, and it does not seem that impartial or neutral.

17 July 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Website looks good but isnt

Website looks good but the damn annoying page reminder to the right is poo enough to block the website for ever.

We get it, you have written 2 articles, but we want to read the one we clicked. Not the one you want me to read

13 August 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Accept cookies or pay.

Accept cookies or pay.
Putting tracking free browsing behind a pay wall is at best a poor attempt to monetise a website. This just screams "do not trust this site".

12 August 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Doesn't follow its own code of conduct, lies by omitting information and pushes feelings as facts.

Doesn't follow its own code of conduct especially the parts around making sure that it's news articles are factually correct. Unfortunately this takes second place towards pushing a political standpoint or a false narrative. I've personally seen many Evening Standard articles both online and in their print newspaper lie by omitting information, push emotional arguments of the journalist over facts and misrepresent quotes. I've even emailed them to point out where their journalists were incorrect but they've never once responded to me. By all means have your political leanings. By all means be part of the progressive left but make sure you include all of the facts so that readers can verify what they're reading and so that you're letting them come to their own conclusions.

16 January 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Shambles of a WOKE piece of bog roll.

Shambles of a WOKE piece of bog roll.
Now calling Reform UK “Far Right”…..how pathetic are these Marxist, Liberal, extremists going to get?
Try employing sane people and not ones that have their own little agenda to follow.

12 January 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Propaganda news

Just read what appears to be a one sided news article, very clearly bought and paid for propaganda claiming to be news. A ridiculous news source / outlet. They clearly don't allow comment on their site for a reason. You should really be able to block these types of sites on Google.

8 January 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

You refer to right wing march on 26th October as TR

You refer to right wing march on 26th October as T. Robinson supporters 'far right'? What an absolute disgrace!! They are honest, hard working, british citizens, who are going to London for a peaceful, march. That's all! The Extreme far left and Hamas Supporters have their marches, at every given chance! You are an absolute joke and talking in this 'rubbish' way about the majority of the country's citizens. I assure you it will be peaceful on their behalf. SHAME ON YOUR DIS INFORMATION

25 October 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Is it available anywhere in West London?

Do they even bother to distribute the new Standard anywhere in West London since it's weekly re-launch?

I used to pick up a copy almost daily. Now I can't find it anywhere.

Asda Park Royal... nope!
North Acton Underground Station... nope!
Acton Main Line station... nope!

Annoyingly, I've yet to see a single copy since re-launch. What on earth has gone wrong with the distribution?

Little point in re-launching the paper if regular readers can't ever get their hands on a copy!

10 October 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

London Standard launch at 'dawn' with…

London Standard launch at 'dawn'with editors living in a Fleet Street bubble.
Unable to frame the customer base of a 200 year old historical paper.
The last thing they wanted to see is an A I picture of a winter fuel tzar, for more political blood letting by mighty press barons, gone by days.
The nation is quick at letting the London Standard rest in peace outside the stations by squatting in City Am distribution boxes, alienation by a design, wobbly
marketing 'relaunch at dawn' 09/2024

26 September 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Dylan Jones Article on Connaught Village

After reading an article written by Dylan Jones that is so venomous about Connaught Village and its supposed ambition to revival Marylebone High Street I felt compelled to write this review.
How dare you, Evening Standard, allow the bias nasty opinion of your editor in chief to be published. Do you realise how an article like this can impact on existing businesses operating there, frankly putting people off from visiting!! The independent businesses operating there are probably struggling with rising costs already and don’t deserve this kind of negativity.
Furthermore, the rents in Connaught Village are a fraction of what they are in Marylebone High Street, something Mr D Jones has not factored in his vile review.
The article basically appears to be written out of some misguided hatred, possibly for the Church Commissioners? by a frustrated nasty closet.
I will be taking this further as a complaint as this kind of nasty journalism needs to be stamped out.

2 April 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 2 out of 5 stars

Can’t read

Can’t read as jumping the page over and over agin. Very annoying best to avoid. Journalist of today not what it used to be. Lots of lies and brain wash. Reaching many people over the internet has lots of plus and lots of minus .

25 October 2021
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Absolute dross

Absolute dross. No wonder they have to give it away. Mouthpiece for Osborne and his employer's mates. Use to line cat litter tray.

2 November 2020
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look