Goldsmith Property Reviews 11

TrustScore 3 out of 5

2.9

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Company details

  1. Property Management Company

Written by the company

We are a property management company run by landlords for landlords. We put legal compliance at the heart of the service we offer, to make sure our landlords stay the right side of the law and avoid fines and penalties, and to ensure that our tenants are safe in their properties. Offering a professional service to our landlords and tenants, we aim to push the boundaries of professional property management and provide massive value to our clients. With Goldsmith Property you will get safe, compliant property management, that lets you sleep well at night and ensures your properties are looked after and give you hands-free income.


Contact info

2.9

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

11 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Tried to take my holding deposit

Tried to take my holding deposit. Please read this if you are looking at renting a property through this company. This company tried to keep my holding deposit as they didn’t like my credit report, they had only had it for three hours. I had to argue to get it back, and eventually Ben admitted it only cost him £12 for the credit search, not the £345 he tried to keep! Do not believe the lies on the website about being ex renters and caring, that’s nonsense! Be very careful and insist you get your deposit back if they try to steal it from you!

Foot note: read Bens message below between the lines, it’s embellished and not completely accurate. One thing that is accurate though is the condescending tone of the message, expect to be dealt with like this if you are renting from this outfit.

Ben, are you aware of the data protection act? You have just disclosed information from my credit history which you gained from a search. This information is protected and you have disclosed it on a public forum. I won’t engage further on this chat as you have crossed a line. I will be getting legal advise.

24 March 2025
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

Reference your subsequent comments:
- Most of what I have written in response to you is factual, so I am not sure how that is condescending. If you believe that any of the below is incorrect I am happy to amend as required.
- With respect to the GDPR issues, you have chosen to raise this matter in a public forum, in fact across several public forums, and specifically raised the issue of your credit report. As you have raised this matter, I have every right to respond with the relevant details and explain that far from just ‘not liking’ your credit report, you had withheld relevant information that was critical to your suitability for the property. I have checked this matter with the Information Commissioner’s Office and they do not see any breach in data protection here.

Hi Mark,

Thanks for proving to me that no good deed goes unpunished.

Let’s be clear about what happened here. You stated in your pre-application questionnaire that you did not have any County Court Judgements for debts against your name. When we conducted the credit check we actually found that this was not the case. I spoke to you about the matter and you clearly knew this was the case.

So, first point to make clear, you lied on your pre-application form. If you had told me the truth I would not wasted my or your time with a viewing or with negotiating the price for you with the landlord, as I did.

When the landlord accepted your reduced offer you paid a holding deposit to secure the property. The terms and conditions of the holding deposit were clear. Let me quote for clarity:

The Holding Deposit can be retained by the agent if:
• The Applicant provides false or misleading information, and the Landlord or his Agent is reasonably entitled to take into account the Applicant’s actions in providing false or misleading information or the difference between the false and correct information in deciding whether to grant a tenancy to the Applicant;

In paying the holding deposit you accepted these terms and conditions.

Your failure to answer questions about your application accurately was a major factor in determining if you would be a suitable tenant or not.

I was well within my rights to withhold the entire holding deposit of £345 from you on the basis of your false information.

We incurred significant costs due to your lie. The referencing did only cost £12. However, you wasted significant time in the business because of your failure to disclose material facts about your application. You wasted our time processing and setting up your viewing, you wasted my time traveling to the property (over the other side of town from me), you wasted my time during the viewing, my time travelling back from the viewing. You wasted the time it took to set up the tenancy on the system, to set up the referencing request and to review the referencing results, as well as then to contact you to discuss the referencing results.

That’s all time I could have been dealing with someone who was not misleading me and would have passed referencing, or dealing with other important issues in the business.

However, you failed referencing and I felt bad for you. So out of kindness I agreed to charge you for the referencing costs and a nominal additional amount, and to repay the holding deposit minus only £20. I did not have to do this, and keeping all of the holding deposit would not have been stealing in any way at all.

You should be giving me a 5 star review along the lines of, “I applied for a property, I lied on my application, the agent found me out but instead of keeping all of my holding deposit, which he was well within his rights to do, he only charged me a nominal amount to cover a fraction of his costs. Thank you for being so understanding – 5 star review!”.

Instead I get a 1 star review. I think you need to take a good hard look at yourself.

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

At the start of this year I decided to…

At the start of this year I decided to take over the management of my HMO myself. During the time Ben and Co managed the property we were fortunate enough not to have a large turn over of tenants within the property and we are lucky with the tenants who are living there.
Therefore , I feel, Ben did not have a large amount of work that needed to be carried out so the basics should of completed with ease. I am also the maintenance company on the property so any works that needed to happen I did myself within my construction company.

The tenants rarely received room or house inspections as per agreement and upon a recent tenant leaving , we came across issues where they should not have received their full deposit back. The room was clearly NOT inspected properly to the deposit handed back. The tenants possessions which included a huge old fashioned dressing table was left, burnt areas and heavily stained carpets as well the room being left disgustingly filthy. The window was also broke and unable to close and lock which meant the property remained unsafe. The curtain poll was also broke.
The cleaner of the property ( who only cleans the communal areas) checked the room when the tenant had left and found the state it had been left in.
All of the above has since been rectified at our expense as the deposit had been returned and the tenant emigrated.

I messaged Ben regarding the dresser and was assured it would be collected, 2 weeks had passed and still not collected. I messaged again , to which it was eventually collected.
I then addressed the poor condition of the room to Ben and questioned why the deposit was returned with no inspection in place and also asked for a convenient time to meet to hand over the keys to the property as our contract had now ended. I also requested copies of the original inventories for the property. The message was replied with ‘ really busy as end of the month, am collecting the information you want. it will be next week’. This was sent on the 31st of Jan. No further correspondence or communication has happened since.

Since the cleaners last visit Ben has left all the keys at the property for us but ignored our messages regarding the damage. I was not made aware he was coming to the property to leave the keys.

All of the above has been rectified by myself at my expense due to the negligence of Ben’s work and lack of professionalism.

I have still not been given any inventories or recieved a response regarding the room.

I would not recommend Ben (Goldsmith property) as a property manager as I have not received the level of service expected that I paid for.

17 February 2025
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

I am seriously disappointed in this review Jack.

We managed this property on your behalf for years, we selected great tenants for you, you never had rent arrears, we kept you fully compliant with the ever increasing regulations, we dealt with all issues raised by the tenants and basically did everything needed to manage the property effectively on your behalf.

But in addition to this I also provided you with a huge amount of advice on setting up the HMO, as it was your first, and on your HMO license application with the Council. With my help you were able to convince the Council that you did not actually need a license, saving you over £1,000. I also attended the meeting you had with the Planning Officer to help you sort out the planning issues that there were with the property, and we successfully found a resolution to this, with my help.

If you really want to give me a 1 star review after all of the work I put into this property, some of which was above and beyond and I did not charge you for, then fine do that. It is not the way I would repay years of excellent service provided, and we clearly have a very different set of values in this regard.

Reviews make a huge difference to small businesses and this one is completely unfair.

I would also disagree with you on your assessment of the recent tenant departure. The room was not disgustingly filthy. Could it have done with a dust and quick hoover, yes, but it was also empty for some time before the cleaner looked in and dust does accumulate over time. Believe me, if you think that was disgusting then you have a lot to learn as a landlord.

The end of the curtain pole had come off. That is a maintenance issue, not something that a tenant deliberately breaks. The window was not a security issue, it is on the first floor and not an easy point of access. Again, this was a maintenance issue and something we did not see on check out. We do not open and close every window when checking out. The dresser was removed. The floor was not burnt, there were marks but nothing that could not be considered wear and tare after several years in a shared house.

We do have the inventories, which had to be recovered from a laptop that was being repaired. I had meant to get them over earlier, but I wanted to organise the photos for you a bit better and had not had chance to. I did not think it was a matter of urgency as the tenants were not moving out. I will send them now as they are.

As I say, I really don’t think these years of good service justify this exceptionally poor review, but if that is the way you roll then so be it.

Rated 2 out of 5 stars

Landlords Dissatisfaction with service…

Landlords Dissatisfaction with service delivered, and poor complaints handling. Delays in addressing H&S issue with landlord and getting confirmation action was being done to address it. A loose / lifted carpet,a trip hazard, on the landing at the top of stairs at the property the agent manage on our behalf was raised in a periodic inspection which the tenant stated had already caused them to trip on once, it was recorded in an periodic inspection. The inspection was carried out on Thursday the 21/11/2024 at midday signed by letting agent and tenant. The issue of the trip hazard was not passed to the landlord to address until I was sent the report on Tuesday 26/11/2024 at 16.03. In my view H&S issues should be addresed / sorted as soon as possible and practical. The period between this H&S issue being raised my authorising work and then getting definitive confirmation from the letting agent it was being addresed was too long and I shouldn't have had to chase to get confirmation clear action on this is being taken to address this. I would have wanted that issue confirmed as addressed or being very clearly addresed sooner. The Periodic inspection report also passed a letting agent responsibility to the landlord to address around keys to the address for a garage. This is a fully managed let and all keys issued and check ins and tenant contact is managed by the letting agent. Two other valid issues for landlord to respond to also flagged up in the report requesting a response. I had officially replied to the report in a polite email within 2 hours of receiving the report instructing work to address the H&S trip hazard, I also addressed the other points and made it clear the keys point is a issue clearly for the letting agent as they have all property keys and manage check ins etc and passing to tenants. I asked for an acknowledgement to my email. After not having an acknowledgement I chased up in another email and added questions about key management on the 28/11/2024 at 11.26 copying in the Director, I requested a response by 18.00 that day. I got a limited reply at 11.56 am with a request for me to authorise scaffolding at the property for re-rendering work to commence. I authorised work and advised i want it done ASAP and to liaise with the tenants and contractors and reiterated i wanted full reply by 18.00 that day. I had a reply on keys held and issued by that deadline but other points not fully replied to. I was not satisfied with the service provided and concerned about the H&S issue, so complained in an email to the Director that evening setting our specific points I wanted addressing. The following day I got a reply from the Director at 12.24, critically he confirmed the H&S issue was being addressed, which was a relief, he confirmed one other point was addressed/understood, and passed the other points to his manager to come back to me. He had not apologised in the email or addressed every point as requested. Over the following hours in emails and 2 phone calls we made progress on some points but not all. I found the experience one of the most frustrating I have had in 10 years of dealing with letting issues. On the final call with the Director having not had an apology in our emails or on the calls I pointed it out to him he had not apologised and asked if he wished to, he did finally. He had on our first call acknowledged a shortfall in his initial handling of the complaint but not apologised for the issues raised. Sadly the issues around the response to my complaint to him reached a point where I was so frustrated i hung up on him as i was approaching my child's school gates, it was incredibly frustrating. This was rude of me and I am sorry for it. Over that day I was not abusive, sweary, or threatening but i was very frustrated, that is why i hung up on him. Further emails were exchanged, some progress on some points raised is being made, I hope further progress is made next week, and hope the re-rendering work will be closely and positively managed over the coming weeks. The Director at my request also provided me with a copy the complaints policy and confirmed who the registered Data Controller is for the letting agency managing any subject access requests. The complaints policy is well written. a 2 star rating is 40% satisfaction. As the Director could attest, and may in any reply, I was not happy. Some issues are partially resolved but I do intend following the agents complaints policy. In fairness to the Letting Agent when this all comes to a conclusion if there is a capability on trust pilot to add a comment /update i will and reflect if the issues improve/resolved. We will see, i hope so.

29 November 2024
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

Hi Mr Owen,
As discussed on the phone and by email, I do feel that this 2 star rating is uncalled for. I will try to be brief in my response:

• Health And Safety Issue – landlords, and agents acting on their behalf, are required to remedy maintenance and safety issues in a reasonable time-frame. If there is imminent danger of death or injury to a tenant, this could be immediately, otherwise guidance varies on how long is a reasonable time-frame, generally between 14 and 30 days. This matter was not deemed serious enough that the tenants reported it independently, but only raised it when the inspection took place. While in the upstairs hallway, the carpet coming loose and creating a trip hazard was in the bathroom doorway, not at the top of the stairs, which would have created a much more serious hazard. A contractor was booked in to do this work within the week following the report. It is my belief that this is a more than reasonable time-frame for resolving this matter.

• Keys – as we discussed, we did not check the tenants into the property so were not as sure about which keys had been handed over as we normally would be. We took the tenants comment at face value about not having been issued certain keys and as you pointed out they seem to be mistaken this. A simple matter now resolved.

• Rendering Work – you initially told us to ask the tenant when a convenient time would be for this, rather than just instruct the contractor to liaise with them. This delayed the start date a little. Subsequently, when we had not managed to speak to the tenant, you said to just proceed. At all times we followed your instructions on the matter.

• Full Reply Demanded by 6pm – when we spoke on the phone you stated that you had only asked for an answer about the keys by 6pm, not on all issues raised. You did receive an answer on the keys by midday, but the other issues took longer to respond to you on. I hope you will understand that externally imposed deadlines like this are sometimes just not possible to meet. As a team we have things scheduled into our diary that we need to do and we have to prioritise between the various demands on our working time.

I understand that you are not happy, but I feel we have responded to the issues above effectively and in a reasonable time-frame, maintaining our high standards in managing your family’s property.

Regards,
Ben Goldsmith

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Recommended managing agent

We have worked with Ben over a number of years and he has always been completely reliable and professional. He is respected by both us as owners and the tenants. I can recommend him as a managing agent to ensure everything is done correctly and quickly.

5 November 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Misleading messaging

Advertised a property that allowed a family with one child. Organised a viewing with me, but then decided they no longer accept family with any child at viewing. Just wasted my time.

Could have communicated the change with me before the vieiwing.

Neither consistent nor reliable

22 March 2023
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

I am sorry about this. We had originally been told that the landlord would accept a young child in the property, but then were told that they did not feel a 1 bedroom flat was appropriate for a small family.

We have subsequently amended the advert and are clear about this with people wanting to view. I am sorry that we wasted your time on this occasion though.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Helpful and informative

Goldsmith properties were extremely helpful throughout our search for a tenancy. Ben was very responsive to any emails or calls.
The whole process was made smooth and easy and I feel they went above and beyond most letting agents.

1 December 2022
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

Thank you so much for the great review Kara. It was great to get you moved in quickly. I hope you enjoy your time in the new flat. Ben

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

The property is clean well maintained…

The property is clean well maintained we also have a cleaner who come's in once a week to clean and tidy the place up all repairs and maintenance issues are resolved swiftly.

21 September 2021
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

Thank you so much for a great review, I am glad you are happy with Goldsmith Property.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Goldsmith you rock!

The properties are excellent, all mod cons, all in good condition, everything you need, and the value which includes internet and a cleaner is as good as it gets. The £200 approx deposit was a nice touch too - as opposed to the standard months rent - showing they are actually decent and fair property organisation. The service though is what I've appreciated the most, any issue brought to light is resolved immediately, they're happy to spend the money too if needed. You're being dealt with by very professional, friendly, reasonable people, who clearly take pride in the standard of their service. They are mindful too of the dynamic of a shared house, and try to bring the right ilk of people together. The landlord Ahmet is absolutely brilliant, the communication is right on the money, and he works tirelessly to keep everyone happy. The handyman too is an absolute star. Five star Goldsmith, Superb

15 August 2021
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I’ve been with Goldsmith Property for 5…

I’ve been with Goldsmith Property for 5 years now and they are a fantastic landlord. The are professional and helpful and understanding. The property is well maintained and kept clean as they have a cleaner to keep up the property. I will definitely rent from them again.

6 August 2021
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

Thanks for the great review George, glad you are still happy after 5 years.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Renting through Goldsmith Properties…

Renting through Goldsmith Properties has been absolutely the best decision me and my girlfriend have made. Any problems we have had so far have been fixed immediately and Ben himself has come over to check them out and oversee they have been properly tended to. We had problems with previous housemates that was dealt with very professionally and Ben was very understanding. Could not recommend enough!

6 August 2021
Unprompted review
Goldsmith Property logo

Reply from Goldsmith Property

Thanks for the great review Eddy, it is much appreciated and glad we could help you out.

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look