Goldsignals.ioReviews 

479
TrustScore 4.5 out of 5

4.5

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

See what reviewers are saying

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Don't believe the hype or reviews they don't reflect the results. 2 Channels for signals, Swing & Intraday. No explanation of either or advice on trading them. Titles obviously denote the timeframes b... See more

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Really happy with the signals so far, I’ve made the subscription money back already. The support is always there to help when you have any sort of problem. They’re transparent with their results. Over... See more

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I have been observing these guys for a while now and can say that they are trustworthy and their signals are pretty accurate. They are responsive to queries and have a full track record on their websi... See more

Company details

  1. Business Networking Company

Written by the company

The BEST Gold signals in the industry


Contact info

You should know

4.5

Excellent

TrustScore 4.5 out of 5

479 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Asks customers to review

This company invites their customers to review, whether positive or negative

Replied to 57% of negative reviews

Typically takes over 1 month to reply

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

4.5

All reviews

(479)

54 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review
Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Dishonest

Needs to work on improving the entry points for transparency. Too many hindsight entry that are posted with TPs already hit. Even posted an entry that didn't happen while claiming wins on TPs already hit. Example is posting a short entry at 5018 even though the highest price around that timeframe was 5017 before they claimed TP win at 5016. Though since I was already trading and caught the trade immediately, the actual price at the time of his first post advising to sell, was 5015-5016. So 2nd post with entry price posted of 5018 with TP1 at 5016 is dishonest and unattainable

3 trades today posted with same issue. Entry price posted is the price they post as the TP1 price. I was active at the time of first notification for all 3 trades, so no delay in entering. Then they can claim a win immediately even when direction of the trade goes against them.
4th trade today with hindsight pricing. This time sent sell signal. Price went against them very fast and 2 minutes later they post an entry for higher price of 5038 even though at time of first post price was 5034. Can we have some honesty please and not price manipulation? When first post comes out I would imagine they are aware of the price the signal was triggered. I follow another provider that sends first signal with entry price in it and then will follow up with exit SL and TPs. Would be nice if they did the same to have honesty.

It's been 1 month and still continues dishonest tactics of posting entries and TPs that have already hit. Based on there entry manipulation, TP1 is actually the entry point of the trade. TP2 is very close to TP1 so risk reward is not good at all and based on amateur trading. TP3 being the first target would make it a more professional risk reward ratio.

They continuously post trades that have already hit TP1 thus covering themselves and claiming it as a win when the trade goes negative and hits SL. Thus inflating profits. Unless the trades hit TP3 minimum you will lose money. Until they revise their strategy, this is not profitable and avoid at all cost.

10 February 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 3 out of 5 stars

The signals are highly accurate IF you are able to catch them

The signals are highly accurate, there is no denying that. However many signals are posted within a few seconds of the price already passing the entry point with a tiny TP1. Some I noticed already passed the entry point at the time the signal was recieved to telegram. Then they will post how they smashed it again blah blah but you have little chance of executing such signals and checking validity of entry.

Other entries are better but with relatively few signals posted across the day and in different sessions you will likely see that life gets in the way and catch only a few.

Of course gold can move fast, no denying, so if you never leave your computer you might make some headway. Perhaps this is better suited to using an autocopier with some testing but for manual trading even if you watch like a hawk you won't catch many signals unless you stay up all night and burn out. They must know that, yet count these signals as wins but I wager a huge number of signal followers miss them since you can't react in time.

Just too many instances of the signals being recieved as they hit the tape for my liking. For information I had a 3 month subscription to properly test and am at my computer all day UK time and I still miss many signals where you might have less than several seconds to enter.

If it were not for this, I'd give them five stars for accuracy. I'll likely use them again when in a position to test an autocopier but not for manual trading. The telegram is otherwise well setup and everything else is legit from what I can see.

6 February 2026
Unprompted review
Goldsignals.io logo

Reply from Goldsignals.io

Hey Chris, `

Thanks for your honest review ! Glad you appreciate the accurracy !

As with regards to the signal entries actually what you've experienced in the week is not the norm and often you have quite some while to enter the trades several minutues to sometimes even valid for hour or two after the signal has been posted.

Last week Gold moved at unprecidented speeds with large market crash, for context in one last week it went crazy it moved 5000pips, that kind of movement usually takes place over several months to a year !

Anyway its a one off black swan event, (largest in golds history) but that should clear things up on why it felt last week the signals had to be enetered in so fast.

In short it was just that few days of those super quick entries.

Regards,

GoldSignals.io Team

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Proper signals

Good profits! Only been with the team 3 weeks but more than satisfied. As long as you know what youre doing re RR, lot management etc you can't fail.
Looking forward to a long and fruitful journey.

11 January 2026
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Consitant full Targets

Two weeks in and having consistent wins. Most of the calls hit full target. If you risk manage well, you'll be astounded. I also think the analyissis that is given is quality not many providers give this and has been helping me understand the markets a lot more starting to feel in sync with gold !

7 January 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Best of the best

Best of the best. You just have to trust the process and be a winner! I wish they can advance and send each sigals with a chart for learning the technical or fundamental behind the trade.

4 January 2026
Goldsignals.io logo

Reply from Goldsignals.io

Thanks for the kind words ! All VIP's Just got access to our full course for free ;)

- GoldSignals.io Team

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Exceeded expectations

Even though I'm a very cautious trader, only ever BUY gold and ignore SELL signals, don't use any signals between 12pm and 10am .... I had a very profitable first week thanks to Goldsignals.io using signals sent by this provider.

11 December 2025
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Communication is great

Communication is great, the signals are very impressive, even though I traded to TP1 and P2 levels there was sufficient winning trades, have had text conversation wih staff, very helpfull

10 December 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Everything is excellent and I am very…

Everything is excellent and I am very satisfied with the service. The only thing that could be improved is having a bit more communication when closing or leaving old positions open. Apart from this small detail, everything works perfectly. Thank you 😊

30 November 2025
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

10/10🙏🙏🙏

I had a very good experience with Goldsignals.io.
The support team was professional and responded quickly when I contacted them.
Even though I didn’t use the service, they handled my request with respect and processed my refund smoothly and without any problems.

I really appreciate their honesty and the way they treat customers.
Thank you for the great service!10/10🙏🙏

29 November 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

GoldSignals

I started out on the 1-month plan with GoldSignals.io just to test things out, and I’ve now switched to the 3 month plan.

Good results and consistency with their calls and I’ve learned whilst making £.

Customer service is also worth noting, resolved an issue instantly.

19 October 2025
Unprompted review

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look