GCP Central Reviews 174

Easy to fit into a busy schedule, flexible approach as the course can be completed by module. Information well prepared easy to retain

The modules are well constructed.
The Test is difficult.
It helps do divide the test in parts. for each module one test. Is's a lot of information for people are unfamiliar with research.

Lack of (human) interaction both in the course and in the email interactions. I have been PI for over 30 y and last year only discovered 2 weeks after my certificate expired that I have failed to do the re-training due to a heavy year when I had to travel up and down from abroad to take care (as the only remaining family member) of my mother who had emergent health issues. The organizers did not allow me to do the re-training given their rigid rules. GCP discipline literatlly over corpses! In the years before when GCP courses where given onsite (I used to be one of the lecturers) was much more useful and human. These days it seems that the business model prevails. Good luck!

There was an enormous amount of information and only three attempts to get a certificat. I don't know if I needed to get a 100%, but I do know that both 64% and 71% weren't good enough, eventhough in normal life this would have been a passing grade. I you intend for us to get a 100%, then give people space to have more trials. It felt to difficult in my opinion.

To have been guided through the transition to ICH GCP R3 in a clear and engaging way through the use of videos.

Good: lay-out of e-learning is great and very user-friendly.

Not good: too much details, takes too much time.

The presentations are clear and various support help us stayed focus on the training

the whole proces is very unclear.
When i finished one part of th course I get a certificate that I completed the course, and this happens every time I finished a part.

The training was clear, the structure and the educational path to follow. Looks great, much diversity in learning methods.

Clear course highlighting the relevant changes. Great to see more pragmatism and proportionality in the R3 version.

The content is well-structured, with changes clearly highlighted. It opens with thought-provoking questions that effectively engage the reader, making it very easy to follow.

Chaotic, I cannot go back toi the home page, questions and items did not appear until I reopened sessions that were apparently not yet concluded.
The course has little significance for clinicians doing clinical research

I really do appreciate for your efforts in preparation of this course! It was concise, informative and easy to use.
Let me please make some comments regarding the typos:
1) Chapter "Principles and Scope", "Updated GCP Principles", p.3, 1st Table. There is a typo in the header of the table, instead "ICH E6(R3) PRINCIPLE", "ICH R6(R3) PRINCIPLE" is written.
2) Chapter "Preparation", "Roles & Responsibilities: Sponsors", "Requirements for IPs with Marketing Authorisation" section, 1st sentence. There is a typo "... and batch sample management.e management." at the end of it.

Training was very clear and logical build.

The structure and content, including the notes and exercises, are well-organized, clear, and easy to follow, making the learning experience highly effective.

Nice, not boring and relevant update course

Good, comprehensive summary of ICH-GCP E6(R3)
Questions are motivating to search more information
In the video's important information is summarized, not to long

Well, from a didactic point of view it was pretty shit. Only texts to read, no interactive content like videos or lectures from professionals. The questions in between the text blocks referred to topics not yet explained or where so far apart from the teached content that they left a negative impression and removed the last shreds of motivation after reading text for hours. I have listend to a GxP course beforehand and was furthermore astounded that topics like ALCOA where not mentioned. So, bad teaching style, the exams questions where not covered sometimes in the teached material and overall unimpressive methods. Unworthy of more than one star.

Ok in general but not user friendly and lack of videos and interactive module