Bay Area IP Group, llc Reviews 58

TrustScore 3.5 out of 5

3.6

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

See what reviewers are saying

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

For my self experience Clients Mr.Juan Fernandez with this Firm attorney’s ! Mr. Ari Bentolila they’re one the best top lawyers service your can trusted.

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

These people are the Best ! From day one their Team -Ariel, Abby, Libby, Mei and the rest have been extremely thorough, timely, and efficient. The quality of their work has resulted in the ”Allowance... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

They missed nearly every deadline, were rude, hung up on me, and then threatened not to complete the work I'd paid for unless I removed a negative Yelp review. They were not willing to have a sim... See more

Company replied

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

What a nightmare!!! “There is no attorney here” They will take your money and will not do what they are paid to do! This is a warning to all that think about using Ari he is not an attorney !!! Thi... See more

Company details


Contact info

3.6

Average

TrustScore 3.5 out of 5

58 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Replied to 50% of negative reviews

Typically takes over 1 month to reply

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

RUN!!

RUN! This is a scam just like the others said.

Ariel claims to be an attorney when he is not. That's fraud. They took our money (as they seem to have done to many), then don't do the work or do poor work. You will never be able to speak with Ariel after you pay. His gatekeeper Abby (who possibly pretends to be Ariel) will be the only one you can speak to and she is nasty.

Report them to USPTO and DOJ. & of us have done so. The more filed, the more DOJ will consider criminal action.

Sue them in small claims. You do not have to go to arbitration.

Address to serve them:
100 Pine Street, Ste. 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111

RUN!

UPDATE: They respond by calling me a liar which is exactly how they respond to the dozens of bad reviews alleging the exact same thing I experienced. The USPTO claim is open and legal action is forthcoming from the government. I filed suit for damages and will post screenshots of the judgment.

13 November 2024
Unprompted review
Bay Area IP Group, llc logo

Reply from Bay Area IP Group, llc

Your edited update demonstrates your continued pattern of lying. For example, you say "The USPTO claim is open"; however, 37 C.F.R. § 11.34(d) specifies that the USPTO must file a complaint or close the case w/in one year after the date receiving a grievance, which proves you are lying b/c you filed your meritless complaint in 2022. Hence, you are in a very small (under 5) club that we are calling liars.

We completed our contracted work for you in 2021. So, why are you now lying about us 4 years later? Also, you made all of these false accusations in your complaint to the USPTO over 3 years ago, and they rejected all your allegations and close the case back then. So, even the USPTO affirmed your wild complaints of fraud, no work, and unethical behavior are false and/or have no credibility. Also, the fact that you did not later seek mediation also confirms that your allegations have no credibility and that should be generally disregarded. Yet, you repeat those same defamatory lies here, in violation any kind of decency and of the non-defamation terms of our service agreement, which lies are not protected by free speech. As the USPTO determined, we properly did our patent drafting work that you contracted us to do, yet you decided at the last minute not to have us file it because of patentability concerns we warned you about during the patent search process. Throughout the process Ariel offered to consult with you at his hourly rate agreed upon. Yes, he does not work for free. So, it is unreasonable for you to expect otherwise. You are the one that refused to pay for his time for the patentability opinion you later requested, which was clearly not included in our flat-fee patent preparation quote.

Also, you are misinformed. We employ a mix of patent agents and attorneys, depending on the type, needs, and budget goals of the client. Our attorneys are typically more sensible for work on high budget, corporate cases/clients.
That is, we have a mix of patent Attorneys and Agents, which enables us to have the range skills and labor cost to optimally fit the budget and legal quality needs of clients ranging from big budget Fortune 500 companies, to low budget individuals needing basic minimal cost patent filings, which Attorney labor is usually too costly for. In this way, we can use lower cost agents to do the bulk of the routine work and Patent Prosecution Lawyers/Attorneys to do the value-added final high skills “polishing”/strategy work. For the past >20 years, this formula has uniquely provided the best value (legal quality vs cost) to our clients, and is actually one of our big advantages over Attorney-only firms.

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

What a nightmare!!

What a nightmare!!! “There is no attorney here”
They will take your money and will not do what they are paid to do! This is a warning to all that think about using Ari he is not an attorney !!!
This place will not perform the service !!! Check for more reviews to confirm my review !!!
Do not waste your hard earned money with this non attorney !!! He will use excuses for not performing the services paid for!!! Repeat he is not going to provide the services paid for!!!

10 August 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I got 3 patents completed by them

!0 years ago I was on a tight deadline. I needed to file a non-provisional patent application. They helped me get it done despite the short deadline. Since then they have helped me get 3 patents with three certificates.

23 July 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Bay Area IP helped me on 3 patent applications

I have worked with Bay Area IP for three patent applications starting from 2018 to 2025. With Bay Area IP team's great support, two of my applications got patent granted by USPTO and the 3rd one has been recently allowed for patent issuance. Bay Area IP is a very professional legal team. Abby, Libby, Mai are always on top of my applications. In my 2nd application, attorney Ariel Bentolila had a meeting to discuss with USPTO examiner, and finally he turned the application into a successful patent as well. In my 3rd application, I decided to take care the last step by myself for saving the cost, I thought it was an easy step, then I made a mistake. Abby closely guided me to fix the issue, and now everything turns good. I really appreciate Bay Area IP team's support on all of my patent applications!

18 April 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

These people are the Best

These people are the Best ! From day one their Team -Ariel, Abby, Libby, Mei and the rest have been extremely thorough, timely, and efficient. The quality of their work has resulted in the ”Allowance “ of 3 of my USPTO patents and a 4th pending with an accompanying “PCT “ world patent Allowance in progress. I’ve been working with these people since 2018. Thank you so much Ariel and team. Sincerely Brisbin Skiles, Skiles Solutions Inc.

5 November 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Top IP law firm

I got my first patent through BAIP, in an exceptionally challenging and difficult case. I am a mathematician and foreign client of theirs. It is not an easy thing to be first in a world of billions of people to think of an idea. Most people cannot understand a brand new technology, or value it as I do, and I had been let down by a lot of people before. BAIP did the patent search for me at the beginning, then drafted the patent application and submitted it to USPTO. They have an outstanding team of people. The legal process took 3 years, and their lead attorney Mr Bentolila represented me at an examiner interview, speaking eloquently, he overcame the initial rejection. That is why BAIP is exceptional. I recommend Bay Area IP to help turn that idea into a patent, and for other Intellectual Property work.

16 August 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Bay Area IP keeps winning for me

I've been using Bay Area IP for many years, and they keep winning patents for me. Their work is very thorough, and they collaborate with me as necessary to ensure the submission has all the right details. When necessary, they will run an extra mile to explain any complex point to USPTO examiner.
Also, the pricing appears to be easier for an average person to manage: you only pay for one step at a time, rather than for the whole process at the start; and you know exactly what you are paying for.

8 April 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Patent Application with Bay Area IP...

I chose to work with Bay Area IP for my patent applications after finding them online and then having a consultation with Mr Ariel Bentolila. My conversation with Mr Bentolila alone was the deciding factor to go ahead and work with Bay Area IP (if you ever talk to him you will understand what I mean, he is full of knowledge).

Some of my experience with Bay Area IP:
* The prior art search conducted by Bay Area IP found 2 of the top prior art the examiners found in their searches (1xKorean examiner, 1xUSPTO examiner). In fact, the USPTO examiner used the prior art Bay Area IP provided as their main citation, so there were no surprises.
* PCT application was done very fast (even though it was a last-minute request by me) and was very affordable.
* US Patent Application received a "Notice of Allowance" after a couple of Office Actions, and approximately 3 years after filing. I am now using Bay Area IP to file additional continuation applications.

If I have any negative comments it would be that, at times, email responses were slow. However, I always followed up with phone calls and received the information/answer that I requested (in addition, the information provided by Bay Area IP on the patent application process can be quite comprehensive).

Overall, my experience was great and I am continuing to work with the team at Bay Area IP.

8 November 2021
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

SCAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!…

I contacted this company for converting an exisiting provisional patent to a utility patent. I was told it could be done in couple of weeks for $2300. I agreed and paid with a check. when ever I asked for an update I was told they can only give this work once the money reflected on their account my check not cleared yet. So I deposited on 3rd June directly to their account. They said the money is reflecting on their account. On 4th June when I requested for an update of the work I was told my signature is not done properly so the work is still in new case setup status.Potential client status Work can not begin unless this is rectified. I was disappointed realised I have been played well to get money from me not the work and cancelled my order in writing on 4th.June and requested to reimbursement of my money. I try to fallow up with numerous telephone calls to why my money is not returned? No one would accept my calls in their office. These countless calls would end up in some answering services promising me the calls woud be returned. No one ever returned any calls or my money. Then from nowhere on 17th June I got a email like Mafia style Not only I can not get my money back I owe them more money now sice I have cancelled this order which was on sale and gave me a bogus bill to pay. It is been 2months today I have not recieved my money back. My time and money is wasted with this Bay Area IP group. When I read many cosumer comments about this group on many sites It looks like I am not the only one victim with such experiences. I will not recommend Bay area IP to anyone based on my experience.

4 August 2021
Unprompted review
Bay Area IP Group, llc logo

Reply from Bay Area IP Group, llc

Morison Livingston, this is Abby. Everything you say is untrue and/or false; e.g., you continue to say we did not deliver our draft patent to you, despite my 3 times emailing you the work product of our service that you ordered. Obviously, you are committed to an unreasonable, bad faith path calling us a "Scam", when you are the one that refused to pay for our work properly and timely done.

Obviously, you are not telling the truth. That is, if I/we were actually ‘Scam’, yours would not be the only post accusing this, there would be dozens, if not 100s, in our 20+ years of patent prosecution legal work serving well over 2000 clients in that time. Moreover, as licensed member of the US patent bar for ~20 years, we never once received any such or similar complaint. In fact, what you complain about is a contractual obligation you had to pay us for legal work done, which applies no matter what firm you go with, thus revealing your general lack of awareness/knowledge, and/or a malicious intent to defame as retribution for a possibly poor outcome in your personal business financing situation.

That is, you demanded by phone we rush our work, but 2 weeks later had a change of heart because your partner backed out of your business deal, so you are in bad faith, based on no fault of ours. Thus, your reason for cancelling and this Yelp flame are not an issue with our work, business practice, or contract.
You want us to work for free because of your business changes. That is unreasonable, and bad faith. Nothing unfair has occurred. You ordered a service and signed a contract. Like any adult, under the law, you are obligated to the terms of that contract, which are reasonable. The contract has clear terms about fees/bills upon termination; moreover, we did our work (sent to you 3 times), and must be paid for it. Again, the work we done was very timely and according to your order and requests, being done w/in 10 days and delivering our first draft to you w/in 3-4 weeks as quoted. As you can see, you were fully informed, and agreed to these fees. Moreover, because we already prepared (and later delivered) our draft spec for filing all cited fees are due if/when you terminated.
We have made no empty promises or false advertisements, and have done everything according to our quote and our contractual obligations. You, on the other hand, are seeking to breach your contractual obligations, so have no standing in any of your claims, as I’ve pointed out above.

Our contract which you agreed to clearly stipulates your obligations, or work, and our billing, exactly as I have set forth to you, which you are trying to renege upon, thus breaching our contract, in bad faith.

Moreover, because we already prepared (and later delivered) our draft spec for filing all cited fees are due if/when you terminated. These are all perfectly legal and proper fees. However, you are certainly free to file a complaint to the USPTO. We are confident they will agree with our position.

The work we done was very timely and according to your order and requests, being done w/in 10 days and delivering our first draft to you w/in 3-4 weeks as quoted. You are the one who had a change of heart because your partner backed out of your deal, so you are in bad faith, based on no fault of ours.
Irrespective of your late termination, we had already done our work by then, which we sent you. So, we carried out our contract that you ordered, irrespective of you later changing your mind. Hence, you are trying to breach the terms of our contract and your original order instructions.

Hopefully, you plan to be civil, reasonable, and file a free complaint to the USPTO. We are confident they will agree with our position.

Obviously, if they had any merit, given that we are licensed/registered under the patent bar for past ~20 years, you would have simply filed a free complaint with the USPTO if we did anything at all unethical or unjustly took your money, which is not OK by USPTO rules. Anyone can verify that we have not ever had any such USPTO complaints, which validates that we are very ethical and “legit”.

So, given that you only resort anonymous 1 star flames, means there must have been circumstantial factors that left you unhappy, but nothing unethical on our part.

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I missed a lot of red flags.

I missed a lot of red flags. Do your research before giving Bay Area IP any money.
Go to USPTO and search for practitioners. Search "Ari S. Tolila", the principal at Bay Area IP. No results. Search "Ariel Bentolila" or registration number "52614," the founder and principal at Bay Area IP. Mr. Bentolila is a patent AGENT, not a patent attorney. I am still unsure if "Ari S. Tolila" and "Ariel Bentolila" is one person or two different people. Maybe a name change, but why? Now search for other "professionals" shown on Bay Area IP's website. "Zhang Lei Yan" no results. "William B." No last name provided on Bay Area IP website. "Stephen K." No last name provided on the Bay Area IP website. Why doesn't Bay Area IP show the last name of these "professionals" that work at their firm? In fact, any person I have spoke to or emailed at Bay Area IP has not given a last name. Why wouldn't they have their full name in their email signature?
My experience with Bay Area IP:
Absolutely the worst customer service. Bay Area IP promises a lot but doesn't deliver. They take way too long to get anything done and work eventually done is poor quality.
Bay Area IP will not answer emails. Standard response is your email got caught by SPAM(which I don't believe when I am responding to a Bay Area IP email), sent to wrong email address(emails can be forwarded if that is the case.) or just overlooked. I have to call them and maybe I will get a response. Usually takes a couple of calls. Any times frame or deadlines given were never met.
I purchased top level flat rate patent services. After spending thousands of dollars with Bay Area IP and over a year has passed, I received Office Action from USPTO. Keep in mind I paid for top level services. It states in summary:
New corrected drawings are required.
All claims are rejected.
Many errors in grammar. Change "comprise of" to "comprises of", "distant" to "distance", etc. If Bay Area IP can't get the basic grammar correct or take the time to use the correct grammar(which is critical when drafting a patent,) what are the chances of a good patent?
I brought these issues to Bay Area IP. Their response(they actually did respond to this email):
"You received top level service." "Bay Area's work was good." "USPTO accepted the drawings." The Office Action is very complex, but Mr. Bentolila(patent agent, not patent attorney) expects it will not be to hard to overcome, just time consuming."
So to proceed further, I have pay Bay Area IP thousands of dollars to correct their mistakes and for formal drawings. I believe along with other reviewers that work is done poorly so Bay Area IP can get paid additional money for Office Action Responses. I don't mind paying for an Office Action Response, but the mistakes made to this point by Bay Area IP are obvious even to me a lay person. Why pay them to rewrite something that should have been right in the first place?
My new attorney says I have a poorly written patent by Bay Area IP. I over payed for what I received from Bay Area IP. They also never provided formal drawings that will be accepted in a utility application.
Anyone reading this can decide for themselves if I received top level services.
My research shows these people are patent agents and para legals. I have not yet found a patent attorney practicing at Bay Area IP. Remember this when you see look at their pricing.
Anyone considering Bay Area IP, do your research, then research more. Read all the reviews. Ask them to provide their full names so you can research them. If you can at all, consult a local attorney. The consultation may even be free. Even if it costs a little money, it will be money well spent to get professional opinion before going down a long road with Bay Area IP. Show the local attorney Bay Area IP's website, their "professionals" page and ask them about their price structure. You may find local services comparable in price. Just make sure you are well informed before giving Bay Area IP any money.

Response to BayareaIP:
These mistakes were not "typos." There were at least nine grammar errors, using incorrect phrasing that are critical in patent applications. Things that shouldn't happen in a top level patent application.

You did no drafting or drawing work. You only added numbers to drawings and images I provided. I replied with the 5 drawings that I wanted formalized on two occasions. You chose to ignore.

There was plenty of communication, email, calls, dialog from me. I expressed my complaints. Your first response is how everything you done was top level. Your second response was, "However, this is the first time we’re hearing about any quality concerns from you." I then realized you either have a bad memory, don't care or worse. I don't want to do business with people that act that way. That was the last straw and why I went to another firm.

28 July 2021
Unprompted review
Bay Area IP Group, llc logo

Reply from Bay Area IP Group, llc

Steven, upon researching, we discovered that you were not telling a true story. You lack of understanding of patent and their process seems to be the source of all your unwarranted fears and jumping to wrong conclusions as to quality.
You said: “Another patent attorney confirmed my opinion. They said bayareaip made several mistakes, including simple wording and phrasing in my patent incorrect and would never be accepted by USPTO. Bayareaip got alot of the basics wrong.”

However, it was not your opinion or any attorney’s opinion, as it came from the USPTO Examiner’s review in the First office Action, where the Examiner found no quality problems at all in the specification, which is the most critical part of a patent. As we point out below, the Examiner pointed out a few trivial claims typos, which always get amended/corrected in the examination process. So, no big deal as you fear.

Things the Examiner cited like "comprise of" vs "comprising" have no harm in litigation as there meaning is obvious to those skilled in the art, so not a quality issue even if it was not caught and corrected. Also, note that you reviewed that and did not catch it either prior to filing.

Re quality, that is not what you said when we filed your case. You happily approved our final draft with “minor revisions”, and were pleased with the over 30 creative and patent strengthening questions/improvements we made to your original submission, with *no complaints* of errors/problems what-so-ever, and a year later you never replied to my email asking to back up your accusations. So, you are not being truthful when you say "I expressed my complaints."

Your case had no deadlines and you are wrong about what are actual quality issues in patents. We now see that what really happened is that a year later when the 1st OA came, you gave up on patenting your invention, as no response was ever filed letting your patent go abandoned, yet a few weeks beforehand you tried to change Power of Attorney to yourself, not another attorney. Looks likely you ran out of money or interest, and are lashing out your personal issues on us.

Your only legit gripe is the unfortunate delays to our work and communication problems- due to COVID lockdowns mandated in SF & out of our control. That is, unfortunately for everyone, San Francisco was ordered into COVID lockdown starting mid-march, which forced our offices to close, and put our human resources in a complete disarray from then on. As a result, we lost some key workers and our whole workflow got severely backlogged for most of that year, as it was near impossible to higher/train new workers. I see that that we finished our first draft work internally in April, yet lacking sufficient paralegals I see that it was not actually emailed to you until June. Based on your later revision, we got your our Final draft to you in August, and filed it soon after you approved and paid balance for filing. Obviously, this was an extraordinary pandemic situation we all were dealing with. Our normal turn times range from 1-2 months, not the 6 months you experienced. So, of course, is/was not our normal service, goal or original intention. Obviously, if this was not a one-off, fluke situation there would be literally 100s of similar angry clients posting one star complaints, not just yours.

You paid “Top” level, so if you did not get that, you would have complained back then, not a year later when some opportunistic attorney trying to get your new business tells you that it was a “low quality job” b/c “All claims are rejected” and a couple trivial typos in the claims. Anyone who knows anything about patent process knows that nearly all patent apps are initially rejected, and later get allowed upon proper legal responses/amendments.

As outlined above, what is really behind your laundry list of complaints and personal attacks is that you just gave up on your patent, as clearly stated in your 7/7/21 email where you simply said “I paid for the top...I’m disappointed…Every claim was rejected. My device is fairly simple…”
Re “I brought these issues to Bay Area IP”, that is not true. We asked you examples about what you mean and you never replied, then unfairly posted your Yelp flame on us.

Obviously, the root of it all is your extreme misunderstand what is patent quality and normal process, running out of money, which had you giving up, angry then prospected another attorney who played into your lack of knowledge/anger to get your office action response business.
So, of course, your complaints are not representative of our work, and “Bayareaip got alot of the basics wrong” is completely untrue, and our claims exactly matched the scope/structure you requested. Obviously, if it was, over our ~20 years, there would be literally 100s of similar angry clients posting one star complaints, not just yours.

Re drawings, our quote incl. 5 drawings; however, you submitted 15. We should have bill extra for the legal drafting work to cover that many extra drawings, @$100/ea. However, to help make up for of our delays, I let that go. Also, you are the one who had asked us to file with informal drawings, and never later asked us to formalize any drawings, b/c the USPTO accepted the informal one. We offered to formalize any 5 of the ones you select, but you never answered. So, more false understandings/representations from you.

Re your Personal Attacks, he goes by his short name b/c many people, like you in Kentucky, were having a hard time saying his foreign name. So, makes it easier for them. Obviously, I link to my USPTO reg. info on my bio page, so silly and mean spirited that you pretend I’m trying to be deceitful.

Also, we do not list last names of employees for the same reason you posted anonymously, b/c there are too many crazy & violent people these days to put our people at personal risk when simply doing their jobs.

While your frustration w/ our COVID related delays is very understandable, we are personally very disappointed that you did not have a true dialog with me/us before you irrationally and publicly reacted in anger to routine things that get easily favorably resolved in the normal process.

Kindly yours,
Abby
POC Senior Paralegal

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I chose to work with Bay area IP to get…

I chose to work with Bay area IP to get my patent because of their price structure, After three years I was able to get approval stage and thanks to Bay area IP for their diligence and hardwork, the attorneys were experienced and knowledgeable, Definately would recommend them to anyone who is looking to file for patent

19 July 2021
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Buyer Beware

Buyer beware these people are not patent attorneys. They are patent agents.

18 July 2021
Unprompted review
Bay Area IP Group, llc logo

Reply from Bay Area IP Group, llc

Dear Mario, You are misinformed. We employ a mix of patent agents and attorneys, depending on the type, needs, and budget goals of the client. Our attorneys are typically more sensible for work on high budget, corporate cases/clients.

That is, we have a mix of patent Attorneys and Agents, which enables us to have the range skills and labor cost to optimally fit the budget and legal quality needs of clients ranging from big budget Fortune 500 companies, to low budget individuals needing basic minimal cost patent filings, which Attorney labor is usually too costly for. In this way, we can use lower cost agents to do the bulk of the routine work and Attorneys to do the value-added final high skills “polishing”/strategy work. For the past ~20 years, this formula has uniquely provided the best value (legal quality vs cost) to our clients, and is actually one of our big advantages over Attorney-only firms.

Kindly yours,
Abby

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Bay Area IP is great

Bay Area IP has been instrumental in getting us our patent. Every time I need help, Abby clearly explains my options and helps in understanding the legal procedure.

18 November 2020
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I went to Bay Area after several…

I went to Bay Area after several searches in my area. I decided after a very unsatisfying experience with a widely advertised firm I came across Bay Area. The well advertised firm did a pathetic patent search and I thought I would give these guys. Try based on several reviews that were good. I am a first time inventor and they accommodated my inexperience and what amounted to be several design changes. After a couple of rounds of prosecution I was recently notified that I have been granted a design patent. I highly recommend Bay Area IP. If I ever have another idea I won’t hesitate to call on them again. Don Johnson

25 September 2020
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Patent on magnetic tunnel junction based molecular spintronics device

I worked with Bay Area IP about my patent on nanoscale devices. I did a thorough search on different firms before selecting Bay Area IP to make sure I am engaging with a firm with expertise in dealing with the intricate design and fabrication process I wanted to patent. My patent idea is based on microfabrication processes and results of my last 18 years of expertise in molecular electronics devices. Bay Area Ip had a very clear IDF(information disclosure form ) to understand the work scope and had very nominal charges to do the prior art search. They also offered a consultation with the principal patent Lawyer Mr. Ariel S. Bentolila. I had a ~ one-hour discussion about his views and expertise in the semiconductor device patenting field. After that interaction with Mr. Ariel S. Bentolila, I also talked with eight other patent lawyers/firms. I found him uniquely knowledgeable in dealing with my nanoscale device ideas. I'm incredibly pleased with the quality of the draft. They have prepared and addressed the patent examiner questions systematically and with great care. The USPTO finally accepts all the ~20 claims, and I am heading to get the full utility patent. I only had a small concern that occasionally, I had to follow up after communicating the USPTO correspondence to Bay Area IP for the action. However, talking to Ba Area IP staff has been a pleasing and excellent learning experience.

2 September 2020
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Excellent patent preparation work

This firm performs a very thorough and successful work on patents. There are various levels of service according to your budget, and they let you pick and choose what you prefer for the submission or office action. Dedication to the clients and focus on details. Making every effort to achieve the client's success.

12 August 2020
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

BayAreaIP has been a wonderful patent…

BayAreaIP has been a wonderful patent and IP services Law firm to work with. We have been approved in both the USPTO and the PCT department for a software utility patent. Their high value services got us to where we needed to go.

24 June 2020
Unprompted review

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look