I had a highly frustrating experience with the Assurant claim and return process. While my initial claim went through, the replacement device arrived with a faulty camera on day one. Because this phon... See more
Company replied
While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more
To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more
Created with AI, based on recent reviews
.
Assurant, Westemere Drive, Crewe Business Park,, CW16UN, Crewe, United Kingdom
No recent history of asking for reviews
This company hasn't invited customers recently, so reviews may not be representative
Replied to 99% of negative reviews
Typically replies within 24 hours
How this company uses Trustpilot
See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.
EASILY ONE OF THE WORSE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN THE UK. THE SERVICE IS POOR AND THEY CANT EVEN UPDATE YOU PROPERLY ON THE SITUATION. LOST AND CLAIMED MY PHONE ON THE 3RD. ITS THE 17th STILL WITHOUT A PHONE AND STILL AWAITING MY CLAIM TO BE ACCEPTED. IVE UPLOADED WRONG DOCUMENTS, SO NEED TO UPLOAD THE ONES ASKED FOR. NO DETAILS PROVIDED, NO FOLLOW UP, POOR COMMUNICATION & THEY REALLY ARE NOT WORTH YOUR TIME. IF IT WASNT FOR ME CHASING UP AND CALLING THE CLAIM WOULD STILL BE PENDING. WHICH IT IS AND THEY HAVENT EVEN BOTHERED TO CONTACT ME. ONLY GET A ONE STAR BECAUSE A LOVELY LADY CALLED SHARON HELPED ME PROCESS EVERYTHING ACCORDINGLY.

Reply from Assurant
Awful item insurance cover and a very poor claims experience. NOT to Mention, everything was automated. Not once have I talked to a human.
So....
I bought accidental damage cover because I genuinely thought my item would be protected if something accidental happened. It turns out I was wrong.
My external hard drive was damaged after a genuine accident. I visited my sister’s house, accidentally left my bag in the garden, and it rained. The hard drive was inside the bag and was ruined by water damage.
Assurant rejected the claim by quoting broad wording about “taking care of your product.” They mentioned examples like not following manufacturer instructions, using the product in an environment that could increase risk, intentional damage, or commercial use.
But they did not properly explain how those examples applied to my actual claim. They did not identify a specific manufacturer instruction I had breached. They did not say it was intentional damage. They did not say it was commercial use. They simply relied on broad wording and rejected the claim.
I thought accidental damage cover was supposed to cover unexpected accidents. Apparently not.
The communication also felt generic and automated. After I challenged the decision and asked for a proper explanation, I received template-style responses, and then even got a survey saying the claim was complete while my complaint had only just been transferred for investigation.
Based on my experience, Assurant’s cover for items is awful. When you actually need to claim, the cover may not protect you in the way you expect. I would not recommend Assurant for item insurance.

Reply from Assurant
AVOID They repair your phone with the nationwide insurance that you get on the flexplus account. They send your phone to a place where they install cheap glass on it that breaks again straight away by even pressing it! They claim it states they can do this in their terms and conditions and ombudsman lets them do this as they can’t prove the glass is rubbish as assurant won’t say where they got the glass from 😂 avoid!

Reply from Assurant
I am writing this review to highlight an incredibly unfair claim rejection by Assurant regarding an iPhone 17 Pro Max 256GB that lost on 27th May 2026.Assurant rejected my claim by citing a policy clause stating I "deliberately left my device where others could see it, but I couldn't." This is a complete mischaracterisation of what actually happened. The phone was securely in my pocket while I was riding, and it accidentally fell out during the journey. I only discovered it was missing later on.I did not leave the phone unattended, nor did I deliberately expose it to risk. Carrying a phone on your person is standard, responsible care. Assurant is using a loophole meant for "unattended items" to avoid paying out a legitimate loss claim on a premium device. I strongly advise others to think twice before relying on their policy. My claim number is 56068860.

Reply from Assurant
Appalling repair quality and even worse customer service from Assurant (Lifestyle Services Group) via my Halifax Ultimate Reward account.
They repaired my iPhone screen, but returned it with a permanent "Unknown Part" system warning in the iOS settings. This has completely disabled core manufacturer features like True Tone and severely devalued my handset for any future trade-in or resale.
When I complained, Customer Relations (Thomas and Jayden) issued a ridiculous response claiming the message would "disappear after a sync." This is a blatant technical lie. It has been over 4 weeks, and according to official Apple documentation (which my phone links to directly), this error is permanent because Assurant failed to use Apple-certified calibration software.
Now they are trying to waste my time by demanding I visit an Apple Store to prove their own bad repair wrong. Absolute cowboys who use cheap, uncalibrated components and lie to premium bank account holders to avoid responsibility.
I have already raised a formal complaint with Halifax and am escalating this directly to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Avoid at all costs!

Reply from Assurant
Update Tuesday 9 June
Assurant(Scammers) have replied with corporate spin and it does not answer the actual issue.
Assurant says “technical inspection findings”, but they have confirmed to me that there is no full assessment report, only an external visual inspection,
That is not a proper investigation into why a refurbished replacement iPhone failed after around six weeks.
They also cannot provide device-specific refurbishment, grading or QC records proving the replacement phone was properly checked before being sent to me.
So the public reply sounds reassuring, but the reality is simple: Assurant rejected the warranty without a full assessment and without evidence showing the replacement handset was properly checked before dispatch and tried to extort me for a further excess of £75
This is exactly why I am taking it to the Financial Ombudsman.
Original review 8th June 2026
Shocking experience with Assurant / Nationwide FlexPlus mobile phone insurance.
I was supplied a refurbished replacement iPhone 13 Pro Max. After around six weeks, it failed. Assurant then refused to honour the warranty, claiming alleged liquid damage, and tried to charge me another excess.
When I challenged them, they could not provide any device-specific refurbishment, grading or quality-control report proving the replacement phone was properly checked before being sent out. In my view, that is completely unacceptable.
This feels like a system designed to wear customers down: take the monthly fees, send out refurbished devices, then reject responsibility when something goes wrong.
I have reported this to Nationwide and I am taking it to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I am also considering using Money Claim Online, the UK Government court service, to recover my losses.
If this happens to you, do not just accept their decision. Demand the engineer’s report, photos of the alleged liquid damage, photos of the liquid indicators, refurbishment/QC records, and a Final Response letter. Then escalate it.
Based on my experience, I would strongly warn others to think very carefully before trusting this insurance process.
Heres the link to Nationwide to make a complaint if your insurance is part of a package offered by a company (in my case Nationwide)
Complain about them to the Ombudsman. Assurant / LSG are a scam company and will be found out when enough complaints are made.

Reply from Assurant
My iPhone 17 was stolen. Provided all evidence and this scam outfit did everything possible to find a way to cancel my claim. I phoned up and they kept on repeating that if fraud is found I'd be reported like as if to scare me so I cancel my legit claim. Why go into the insurance game if you cant insure and pay out when help us needed. F you

Reply from Assurant
To whom this may concern, I am writting this email to make a formal complaint on the service I have received. I have made a claim for my phone an iphone 14 256gb. On 2 occasions i have received the same phone that is clearly damaged, despite the fact that i have to send it back, device: iphone 14pro, with a gap between bottom right corner screen and body of the phone also screen is operating in slow motion that should not happen on an iphone, unless there is something wrong with the screen. This is so unprofessional for a company by your size. Under UK consumer law consumer rights.
The
phone should be in a condition that a reasonable person would accept. Visible physical gaps or structural failure fail this test instantly.
It must function safely and reliably as a mobile device.
I am aware that you provide used mobile devices but a physical gap and the screen operating in slow motion does not match that description.
Were your team incompetent or were you purposely doing this? Please make sure you send me a satisfactory quality device this time as i also have to pay for printing extra documents in case that i have to send the device back to you. . I do not want to see myself obliged to contact Financial Ombudsman Service FOS. . It is needless to say that I will NEVER use the service from you guys anymore. Your behaviour is shameless and you should be ashamed of the way you are treating your customers.

Reply from Assurant
I called about my defective cell phone. I was asked 3 times for my call back #. We got disconnected and no call back

Reply from Assurant
Just had my damaged phone repaired through Assurant / Halifax banking cover, fabulous service sent and returned in 3 days back cover repaired and camera and lens cover, all had been shattered, Highly recommend their service 🤩
Phone claim went in via Vodafone’s Lifestyle Group insurance service, which I later learned is ultimately handled through Assurant. What a disaster. After this experience, I now know exactly who to avoid moving forward. The 1.6 Trustpilot rating suddenly made complete sense.
I had an Apple Watch Series 10 46mm in Jet Black. I made a claim expecting an equivalent replacement and instead received a Rose Gold watch — aesthetically the complete opposite of the insured device.
I fully understand that policy wording states colour cannot be guaranteed, however customer preference and aesthetics absolutely matter with products like Apple Watches. Jet Black and Rose Gold are positioned and marketed as completely different styles, and a more neutral alternative would have made far more sense if the original colour was unavailable.
When I contacted support, they simply repeated “it’s in the policy” with no real attempt to find a reasonable resolution or alternative outcome.
Even the complaints team suggested “putting a case on it”, which honestly summed up the overall attitude perfectly.
The replacement itself is immaculate, so this isn’t about condition. It’s about poor handling, poor communication, and a complete lack of customer-focused resolution after paying monthly premiums plus excess fees.
The complaint has now been escalated further to the Ombudsman following an immediate deadlock response, with no attempt to try and resolve any disastisfaction.

Reply from Assurant
I am writing this review to warn other iPhone users that Assurant repairs may use non-genuine parts, despite assurances given before making a claim. Stick to Apple Care!!! As the excess and monthly not that different.
In December, I sent my iPhone 14 Pro Max for repair after specifically asking whether genuine Apple parts would be used. I was reassured beforehand, only to later be told they “don’t have software to determine this”, which already raised concerns.
To my surprise, they replaced the phone entirely. Initially I accepted this, although I immediately noticed the battery health was only 85%, whereas my original device had battery health in the high 90s. I complained but was essentially fobbed off.
Then in January and February, the display started behaving strangely. After checking settings, I discovered the warning:
“iPhone cannot recognise camera genuine parts.”
I contacted Assurant again and was again told they could not verify whether parts were genuine because they “don’t have the software.” At that point I lost confidence in the device.
I later upgraded to an iPhone 17 Pro Max and arranged to trade this device into Apple for £320. During the trade-in process, I removed the case and discovered the screen lifting away from the top-left corner, as though the adhesive had failed.
The phone went back to Assurant for repair and I also logged a complaint. The phone returned looking repaired, although I remained sceptical.
Apple then rejected the trade-in entirely with the status:
“Device repair not complete.”
At the same time, Assurant issued their final complaint response apologising for the screen issue and offering me £25 compensation, while I was left facing a £320 loss because Apple refused the device.
I then spoke directly with an Apple Store technician, who advised that Apple can immediately identify non-genuine parts because screens and components have serial tracking tied to the device.
What frustrates me most is the contradiction in the Lloyds/Assurant policy wording. The policy states:
repairs may use “unbranded parts”
they will “repair” the phone or provide an equivalent replacement
and if repairs invalidate the manufacturer warranty, they will repair or replace the phone accordingly
In my case, the repaired device was clearly not equivalent to a properly repaired genuine-condition iPhone, and I have suffered a direct financial loss as a result.
I have now escalated this matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service and intend to pursue it further.

Reply from Assurant
Sent my phone for repair through my insurance claim and received it back fitted with non-genuine Apple parts confirmed directly through the iPhone’s own Parts & Service History. On top of that, the device was returned with True Tone not working and overheating abnormally. I had no choice but to return it, leaving me without any phone at all.
The delays and lack of accountability throughout this process have been completely unacceptable. I have now raised a formal complaint and will be escalating to the Financial Ombudsman Service if not resolved. I am far from alone the reviews here speak for themselves.
Do better, Assurant.

Reply from Assurant
If you're thinking of taking out a car extended warranty package with Assurant, I would implore you don't.
Like others, I spent days chasing a decision on a timing (wet) belt failure, which they eventually rejected on the basis of manufacture replacement guidance. Guidance that is not available to the customer (not anywhere on the Vauxhall website, nor is it within the service book) , nor have they provided me with this to justify their decision since.
Also if you have a policy, it's worth checking through your terms and conditions, because they are supposed to provide you with an annual vehicle inspection which they like to keep quiet about, but will happily chase you for your monthly instalment.
They did provide a mediation service for my complaint, however that was very one sided and was less a "negotiation" and more of a clarification of their position.
Customer service generally is woeful, with huge gaps between teams that you (eventually) speak to, and the teams that make decisions.
I have since cancelled my direct debit as its clear that if anything were to go wrong with my car, they will not pay out. The only thing they are good at is taking your money.

Reply from Assurant
Assuarant do not undertake repairs to a good standard at all. If you have the misfortune of having to have your phone repaired by this company. Expect the device to no longer be waterproof as per its design as they will not guarentee this. Also expect the phone to overheat, have odd responses to touch input and be generally buggy to the point its not really useable as your main phone. I've had a tv and 3 phones all repaired by this company over the years and every repair substandard requiring me to replace the devices completly. Save your time and dont bother with them...

Reply from Assurant
1st claim using Assurant and what a waste of time. Could not fix my sons phone so sent a replacement which straight out of the box would not work. When I phoned they said luckily the replacement was under warranty and I could send it back. The phone was obviously not checked before it was sent out. I will be informing Nationwide as judging by other reviews Assurant is not a good company to deal with.
Reply to Assurant
I have raised a complaint about this with both your company and Nationwide. Please review.
A 1.6 trustpilot review highlights your company has significant issues and I have let nationwide know it is affecting their brand.

Reply from Assurant
Fantastic service from start to finish - easy process when speaking to the contact centre, straight forward postal process and super quick repair - sent it on Tuesday and got it back fully repaired on Friday!!
My original phone was stolen and I made a claim through the Nationwide FlexPlus mobile insurance scheme administered by LSG/Assurant.
The positives first: the initial claim process was quick, the replacement handset was dispatched promptly, and all staff I spoke to were polite and professional throughout.
Unfortunately, the replacement phone itself appeared to be faulty on arrival (USB-C charging issue and no fast charging). I reported the fault within approximately one hour of receiving the device.
What has been disappointing is the process that follows. I was advised that there is no separate process for defective replacement devices supplied faulty on delivery, and that all such cases are handled through the same warranty workflow as a standard customer repair.
This meant returning the replacement phone for technician assessment and waiting for repair/replacement processing, despite the issue being identified almost immediately after delivery.
From a customer perspective, this feels like a fairly unreasonable process when the defective device was supplied by the insurer themselves following an already stressful theft claim.
The staff themselves have been pleasant to deal with — the frustration is really with the rigidity of the process rather than the individuals handling the case.
I will update this review once the matter has been fully resolved.
19/05/2026 Update
After returning the faulty replacement handset for inspection, the device was returned to me marked as “no fault found”.
However, upon receiving it back, the exact same charging issue was still present. Using the same cable:
another phone fast charged correctly,
this replacement handset would only slow charge when the cable was inserted one way,
and would not charge at all when inserted the other way.
I contacted customer services immediately and explained that the fault was still clearly present. Following this, a further replacement handset has now been arranged and collection of the faulty device organised.
At this point, the most frustrating part of the experience has not been the staff themselves — who have generally been polite and helpful — but the process and quality control surrounding replacement devices and inspections.
The fact a device with an easily reproducible charging fault was returned as “no fault found” has significantly reduced my confidence in the inspection process.
I will update this review again once the replacement process has finally been completed.
20/05/2026 Update
So the phone was collected and a new one provided. Not the same colour as I had requested, and not notified it wouldn't be, but at this point I just wanted a working phone. I have still made a complaint about the process and waiting for an update.

Reply from Assurant
DO NOT USE. My BMW was booked into garage with an electrical fault, claim submitted that morning. I was initially told the claim should be quickly approved and car repaired by end of day.
It took Assurant 5 DAYS to approve a "routine" warranty claim, despite both the garage and myself repeatedly phoning to chase. This was at significant inconvenience to myself. When I raised a complaint, they informed me they had "acted within their standard timescales". It comes as no surprise there are multiple 1 star reviews on this site.

Reply from Assurant
Just doing a follow up review as they requested details to respond to my earlier review end o April, which was given to them and since then not a peep out of them.
Any one thinking of buying insurance with these charlatans think long and hard, your excess will be more than the part and labour to fit it.
AVOID at all costs

Reply from Assurant
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.
Learn more about other kinds of reviews.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.